David Irving - Hitler----s War-la Guerra De Hitler -castellano-.pdf 2021 Review

It is a book to be handled with tongs: a testament to the fact that good writing can be used to pave the road to hell, and that the most convincing lies are often those wrapped in the thickest layers of archival dust.

While the book became a bestseller, particularly in Germany, it was met with fierce criticism from mainstream historians. The following points were central to the backlash: It is a book to be handled with

Las tesis de Irving han sido objeto de intensas críticas y controversias. Los historiadores han cuestionado la selección de fuentes por parte de Irving, argumentando que su trabajo se basa en una interpretación sesgada de los documentos históricos. Críticos como el historiador alemán Martin Broszat han señalado que Irving omite o distorsiona sistemáticamente la evidencia que demuestra la responsabilidad directa de Hitler en el Holocausto y otros crímenes del régimen nazi. Los historiadores han cuestionado la selección de fuentes

Contrary to the image of an all-powerful tyrant, Irving portrays Hitler as a relatively "weak" leader who was often manipulated by his staff and was more concerned with military strategy than domestic atrocities. : Readers often describe the work as highly

: Readers often describe the work as highly readable and detailed, with some comparing the narrative flow to that of a novel. Historiographical Controversy